Threatsys One suite
Detect · Investigate · Respond · Prove
AI-powered SIEM, SOAR, FIM and XDR unified into a single intelligent security platform with proactive threat hunting and an AI-powered SOC assistant.
Built in
- AI SOC assistant
- Proactive threat hunting
- Unified SIEM + SOAR + XDR
- File integrity monitoring
Detect
Behavioural detection across endpoint, network, identity and cloud, correlated into one event rather than four alerts about the same thing.
Investigate
The context an analyst would spend an hour assembling, assembled before they arrive: what ran, what it touched, which account, what happened next.
Respond
Containment actions that run under approval rather than autonomously, so an automated action never becomes its own incident.
Prove
The evidence trail a regulator or an insurer asks for afterwards, retained for the period your obligation requires.
What it is actually for
Why did nobody look at that alert?
Because there were four thousand others that day. Volume, not blindness, is what lets an intrusion sit unexamined for weeks.
How long were they inside?
The question every board asks and most organisations cannot answer, because the logs that would prove it were rotated away.
Did our tools actually see it?
Detection rules written against a threat model and never tested against the technique itself. Most fire on nothing.
Who is watching at 3am?
Most intrusions begin outside working hours. Coverage that thins overnight is where dwell time comes from.
How it usually goes
- Six tools producing six versions of the same event
- Analysts opening four consoles to answer one question
- Alerts triaged by whoever happens to be free
- Log retention set by storage cost, not by obligation
With AI SOC 360
- One timeline across endpoint, network, identity and cloud
- The first ten minutes of triage done before an analyst opens it
- Detection tuned to behaviour rather than keyword rules
- Retention that meets the CERT-In 180 day duty, held in India
What is in the console
AI SIEM
Collection and correlation across your existing estate, with behavioural analytics rather than static signatures.
SOAR
Playbooks for the repetitive first steps, gated on human approval for anything that changes state.
XDR
Endpoint, network and identity telemetry unified so lateral movement shows as one story.
File integrity monitoring
Change detection on the files and configuration that should not change quietly.
Threat hunting
Structured hunts against your own telemetry rather than waiting for a rule to fire.
SOC assistant
Answers analyst questions against your data, with the query it ran shown so the answer can be checked.
How a rollout runs
- 01
Connect
Weeks 1 to 2
Log sources onboarded, starting with identity, endpoint and perimeter. You see coverage gaps immediately, which is usually the first useful output.
- 02
Tune
Weeks 3 to 6
Detection tuned against your environment and validated by performing the technique, so you know what actually fires.
- 03
Automate
Weeks 6 to 10
Playbooks introduced for the repetitive first steps, under approval until your team trusts them.
- 04
Operate
Ongoing
Coverage extended, hunts scheduled, and monthly reporting that answers whether exposure moved.
Choose how it is deployed
This is usually the first question a regulated buyer asks, and it changes the compliance position as much as the price. Pick one to see what it means for you.
A dedicated instance rather than a shared one, in the region you nominate, operated by us. This is what regulated entities usually land on: the operational burden stays with us, but your data sits alone and the boundary is easy to describe to an auditor.
Choose this when
- Banking, capital markets and insurance
- An auditor who asks where exactly the data sits
- Contractual isolation requirements from your own customers
Effort and cost
Higher than shared cloud, and usually the answer when a regulator is involved.
What people ask before the first call
Do we have to replace our existing SIEM?
No. It is designed to sit on the estate you already run, and in most deployments we ingest from what you have rather than ripping it out. Where a legacy SIEM is genuinely the bottleneck we will say so, but that is a decision to take later rather than a condition of starting.
Do the AI agents make changes on their own?
Not without approval. Containment actions are gated on a human decision by default, because an automated action taken on a false positive becomes its own incident. You can widen that as your team builds trust in specific playbooks.
Where is our log data stored?
In India by default, which is what the CERT-In Directions require, with 180 day retention configured out of the box. If you need another region for a group policy reason we can do that, but we will flag the compliance consequence first.
How long before it is actually useful?
Meaningful coverage within two weeks, tuned detection by about week six. The first useful output is usually the coverage gap report, which tells you which systems are producing no telemetry at all.
Can it work alongside our existing SOC team?
Yes, and that is the common case. Co-managed means your team keeps the environment knowledge and we take the hours nobody wants to cover.
Works with the rest of the suite
With AppSec 360 on, an application finding is enriched with whether it is being exploited in the wild against you. With GRC 360 on, incidents flow straight into the audit evidence trail rather than being re-typed at year end.
Risk, policy and audit converged into one self-updating compliance cycle…
Consent, rights, grievance SLAs, notices, DPIAs, vendor risk and evidenc…
SAST, DAST, API testing and PTaaS with validated, evidence-backed findin…
Every signal and interaction turned into one relationship. Clients and e…
Role-based cybersecurity training, compliance awareness and practical sk…
See AI SOC 360 against your own environment.
Thirty minutes, your frameworks, your findings. Not a canned demo.






