Skip to main content

Cyber Security Audit & Review

Dark Web Monitoring

Continuous monitoring for leaked credentials, data and brand exposure.

Dark Web Monitoring as-a-Service

Every engagement includes manual validation, a two audience report and free re-testing.

Get a scoped quote+91 96682 00222

What this actually is

Credentials from your organisation are almost certainly for sale somewhere. Not because you were breached, but because your staff reused a work password on a site that was.

We monitor closed forums, paste sites, ransomware leak pages and credential dumps for your domains, your executives, your brand and your suppliers. When something appears, you hear about it in hours rather than finding out when someone logs in.

The most valuable alerts are usually the boring ones. A helpdesk account in a combo list, months before anyone would have noticed.

What we go after

  • Corporate domain and email credential exposure
  • Executive and high-value target monitoring
  • Brand and domain impersonation
  • Ransomware leak site monitoring for you and your suppliers
  • Source code and document leakage
  • Payment card and customer data exposure
  • Threat actor chatter naming your organisation or sector

How we run it

  1. 01

    Understand the business

    What you do, what would genuinely hurt if it stopped, and how much risk your board will carry.

  2. 02

    Assess

    People, process and technology together, because attackers do not respect the boundary between them.

  3. 03

    Benchmark and rank

    Where you sit against your peers and your regulator, with findings ranked by real exposure.

  4. 04

    Roadmap

    A sequenced plan with costs attached, so the business case writes itself.

What you receive

  • Alerts with context and a recommended action
  • Monthly exposure summary
  • Historical exposure baseline at onboarding
  • Takedown initiation where the content can be removed

Who needs this

Any organisation with staff who have email addresses, which is to say all of them. Particularly valuable for banks, government and consumer brands.

How long it takes

Live within a week, then continuous.

Standards this satisfies

  • ISO 27001
  • RBI
  • DPDP Act
  • SEBI CSCRF

Why it matters

There is a gap between knowing you have a security problem and knowing which one to solve first. Advisory work exists to close that gap: an independent view of where the risk actually sits, expressed in terms a board can act on and a budget can be built around.

The other reason is availability. Most organisations do not need a full time security leader, but they do need someone to ask before making a decision rather than after. The cost of the wrong architecture choice, or the wrong vendor, dwarfs the cost of the conversation that would have prevented it.

Choose how you want this delivered

Most of the price difference between quotes comes down to this one choice, and it is rarely explained. Pick one to see what it covers, what it suits and what it costs you.

A defined number of days a month with a named advisor who keeps context between conversations. This is what most organisations actually need: not a large project, but someone to ask before making a decision rather than after.

Choose this when

  • Decisions arriving faster than you can hire for
  • You need continuity rather than another report
  • Board or committee reporting on a regular cycle

Effort and cost

Monthly, with a defined day allocation. Far cheaper than a hire and available immediately.

Scope it yourself, before you call anyone

Answer a few questions and you get an indicative number, the working behind it and what your answers tell us. It runs in your browser, so nothing you type reaches us.

1/5

Which framework are you going for?

What we look for, and keep finding

These are the classes of problem this work exists to surface. Not every engagement finds all of them, but these are the ones that turn up often enough to be worth naming.

  • Capability that does not match the risk

    Heavy investment in one area and nothing in another, usually reflecting what a previous incident or a previous hire cared about rather than where the current exposure sits.

  • No owner for the important things

    Ask who owns third party risk, or identity, and the answer is a committee. Controls without a named owner degrade quietly and predictably.

  • Reporting that does not support a decision

    Dashboards full of counts that never answer the question a board actually asks, which is whether we are more or less exposed than last quarter and what it would cost to change that.

  • Unmanaged supplier concentration

    Several critical services resting on one provider, with no assessment of what happens if it becomes unavailable or compromised.

  • Plans that have never been tested

    Incident response and continuity documents that read well and have never been rehearsed. The first rehearsal always finds something, which is the point of having one.

Who runs your engagement

A practitioner, not a presentation

Advisory work is led by someone who has run security operations rather than only advised on them. The test we apply to our own recommendations is whether the person making them has had to live with a decision like it.

Questions we get asked

Can you get our data removed?

Sometimes. Impersonating domains and phishing sites we can usually take down. Data already on a criminal forum, realistically no. The value is early warning so you can rotate credentials before they are used.

How many alerts should we expect?

The first month is usually heavy because we baseline historical exposure. After that most clients see a handful a month, and we tune out the noise rather than forwarding everything.

Ready to scope your dark web monitoring?

Thirty minutes with a senior engineer, and you leave with a written scope and indicative effort.