Cyber Forensics & Investigation
Cyber Law & Legal Advisory
Expert opinion, regulatory notification support and litigation assistance under the IT Act and DPDP Act.
Every engagement includes manual validation, a two audience report and free re-testing.
Get a scoped quote+91 96682 00222What this actually is
After an incident, the technical questions and the legal questions arrive together and they are entangled. What must be reported, to whom, in what window, and what happens if the answer is uncomfortable.
We advise on obligations under the IT Act, the DPDP Act and CERT-In directions, and we work alongside your counsel rather than instead of them.
Where matters proceed to litigation or prosecution, we provide expert opinion and testimony.
What we go after
- Regulatory notification obligation assessment
- CERT-In incident reporting within the six hour window
- DPDP Act breach notification requirements
- Evidence preservation for legal proceedings
- Expert opinion and witness statements
- Law enforcement complaint preparation
- Contractual notification obligations to customers
- Regulatory correspondence support
How we run it
- 01
Preserve
First priority is evidence integrity. We image and hash before anyone starts changing things.
- 02
Contain
Stop the bleeding without destroying the trail. These two goals fight each other, and experience is what balances them.
- 03
Investigate
Timeline reconstruction across endpoint, network, cloud and identity, until we can say what happened and when.
- 04
Report
Findings written to survive scrutiny from a regulator, an insurer or a court.
- 05
Harden
The root cause fixed, not just the symptom, so the same door is not open next quarter.
What you receive
- Notification obligation assessment
- Drafted regulatory notifications
- Expert opinion where required
- Evidence preservation protocol
- Support through proceedings
Who needs this
Organisations facing an incident with regulatory or legal consequences, and legal teams needing technical expert support.
How long it takes
Immediate for notification decisions, then as the matter runs.
Standards this satisfies
- IT Act
- DPDP Act
- CERT-In Directions
- Indian Evidence Act
Why it matters
After an incident there are three questions that have to be answered, and none of them can be answered well without preparation: when did it start, what was actually taken, and is the attacker still inside. Regulators, insurers and customers all ask them, and vague answers are treated as bad ones.
The most common problem we meet is that the evidence is already gone. Systems rebuilt, logs rotated, machines rebooted in good faith before anything was preserved. How the first hour is handled decides whether the rest of the investigation is possible.
Choose how you want this delivered
Most of the price difference between quotes comes down to this one choice, and it is rarely explained. Pick one to see what it covers, what it suits and what it costs you.
Terms, contacts and access agreed in advance, with a guaranteed response time. The value is not the discount, it is that the first day is spent responding rather than negotiating a contract while an intruder is still active.
Choose this when
- Any organisation holding regulated or personal data
- Boards or insurers asking about incident readiness
- You want the mobilisation clock to start in minutes, not days
Effort and cost
An annual fee, with unused hours typically usable for proactive work. The cheapest reduction in breach cost available.
Scope it yourself, before you call anyone
Answer a few questions and you get an indicative number, the working behind it and what your answers tell us. It runs in your browser, so nothing you type reaches us.
Roughly how many personal records do you hold?
What we look for, and keep finding
These are the classes of problem this work exists to surface. Not every engagement finds all of them, but these are the ones that turn up often enough to be worth naming.
Evidence destroyed by the response
The most common problem we meet. Systems rebuilt, logs rotated, machines rebooted before anything was preserved. What could have been established is often gone before we arrive.
Incomplete timeline
Knowing the breach happened but not when it began. Without an accurate first access, scope cannot be bounded and notification obligations cannot be answered honestly.
Unclear data exposure
The question every regulator and customer asks: what was actually taken. Answering it needs artefacts that only exist if logging and retention were adequate beforehand.
Chain of custody failures
Evidence handled in a way that will not survive challenge. If there is any prospect of proceedings, how the first hour was handled decides whether the findings are usable.
Persistence left behind
Recovery declared complete while access remains. We look specifically for the second and third mechanism, because a competent intruder does not rely on one.
Who runs your engagement
Investigators who have given evidence
Investigations are led by people who have produced findings that survived challenge. Our founder advises law enforcement and has trained officers in cyber crime investigation, so the method is one that police and courts recognise.
Questions we get asked
Are you lawyers?
No. We provide technical expert advice and work alongside your legal counsel. Where you do not have counsel with cyber experience, we can introduce firms we have worked with.
Must we report every incident to CERT-In?
The directions specify categories, and the window is six hours from noticing. The assessment of whether an event falls in scope needs to happen fast, which is why the decision framework should exist before the incident.
Often scoped alongside
- Digital ForensicsDisk, memory and log forensics that reconstruct the intrusion timeline and preserve the chain of custody.Read more
- Incident ResponseContainment, eradication and recovery, led by responders who have done it under pressure before.Read more
- Cyber Crime InvestigationInvestigative support for fraud, insider theft and law enforcement matters, with advisory experience across Indian agencies.Read more
- Crypto & Financial TracingBlockchain and payment trail analysis that follows stolen funds through mixers, exchanges and mule accounts.Read more
Ready to scope your cyber law & legal advisory?
Thirty minutes with a senior engineer, and you leave with a written scope and indicative effort.