Threatsys One suite
Discover · Validate · Remediate · Prove
SAST, DAST, API security testing and PTaaS unified into a continuous security platform with validated findings across applications, APIs and cloud environments.
Built in
- SAST + DAST unified
- API security testing
- PTaaS delivery model
- Validated, no-noise findings
Discover
The whole attack surface found rather than assumed: repositories, applications, APIs and the cloud they run on.
Validate
Automated findings confirmed by exploitation, so what reaches you is real rather than theoretical.
Remediate
Fix guidance written for the developer who has to make the change, with the code path identified.
Prove
Re-testing to confirm closure, and reporting in the form auditors and enterprise buyers accept.
What it is actually for
We ship weekly. How does testing keep up?
It cannot, if testing is an annual event. A point in time test ages the moment the next release lands.
The scanner found 900 things. Which matter?
Automated output without validation is a queue, not a finding list. Most of it is noise and the real issues are buried in it.
Are our APIs tested at all?
The API is larger than the interface and usually tested less, while carrying the authorisation logic that actually matters.
Can we give a customer this report?
Not if it is raw tool output. Enterprise procurement wants validated findings and a summary they can read.
How it usually goes
- Automated SAST and DAST alone, unvalidated
- Findings measured by count rather than by exploitability
- One annual test against a codebase that changed fifty times
- Reports nobody outside security can act on
With AppSec 360
- Automated coverage paired with senior manual testing
- Every finding validated by controlled exploitation before it is reported
- Testing that tracks the release cycle, not the calendar
- A summary written to be shared with a customer under NDA
What is in the console
SAST
Source code analysis across repositories, tuned to reduce the false positive volume that gets scanners ignored.
DAST
Running application testing against deployed environments, authenticated per role.
API security
REST and GraphQL tested against the OWASP API Top 10, with authorisation checked per object rather than per endpoint.
Penetration testing as a service
Senior manual testing scheduled against releases, not once a year.
Secrets detection
Hardcoded keys and credentials found in code and in build logs, which are rarely treated as sensitive.
DevSecOps integration
Gates in the pipeline so a critical finding stops a release rather than being noticed later.
How a rollout runs
- 01
Baseline
Weeks 1 to 3
Full discovery and a deep first test, so you know the real starting position rather than the scanner's version of it.
- 02
Integrate
Weeks 3 to 6
Pipeline integration, with gates set to warn before they block, so nobody's release is broken on day one.
- 03
Cadence
Ongoing
Targeted testing on changes that touch authentication, authorisation or tenancy. We will tell you which releases need it.
- 04
Evidence
Quarterly
Customer-shareable reporting and closure evidence for audits.
Choose how it is deployed
This is usually the first question a regulated buyer asks, and it changes the compliance position as much as the price. Pick one to see what it means for you.
A dedicated instance rather than a shared one, in the region you nominate, operated by us. This is what regulated entities usually land on: the operational burden stays with us, but your data sits alone and the boundary is easy to describe to an auditor.
Choose this when
- Banking, capital markets and insurance
- An auditor who asks where exactly the data sits
- Contractual isolation requirements from your own customers
Effort and cost
Higher than shared cloud, and usually the answer when a regulator is involved.
What people ask before the first call
Is this just a scanner?
No, and that distinction is the whole product. Automated SAST and DAST produce a queue; every finding that reaches you has been validated by controlled exploitation by a senior tester. Volume of findings is not the metric we are optimising.
Will it break our pipeline?
Gates start in warn mode. Nobody's release is blocked on day one. You decide when a critical finding should actually stop a deployment, once you have seen what the gate would have caught.
How does it keep up with weekly releases?
A deep baseline test, then targeted testing on changes that touch authentication, authorisation or tenancy. We will tell you which releases need a retest and which do not, rather than testing everything and slowing you down.
Can we share the report with customers?
Yes. A summary version is produced specifically for that, so you are not forwarding a document full of unremediated technical detail to a prospect.
Does it cover APIs properly?
APIs are tested as a first class target against the OWASP API Security Top 10, with authorisation checked per object rather than per endpoint. That is where the serious findings in modern applications almost always are.
Works with the rest of the suite
With AI SOC 360 on, an application vulnerability is scored against whether it is being probed in production. With GRC 360 on, testing evidence lands directly in the audit trail.
AI SIEM, SOAR, FIM and XDR fused into one AI-driven response system with…
Risk, policy and audit converged into one self-updating compliance cycle…
Consent, rights, grievance SLAs, notices, DPIAs, vendor risk and evidenc…
Every signal and interaction turned into one relationship. Clients and e…
Role-based cybersecurity training, compliance awareness and practical sk…
See AppSec 360 against your own environment.
Thirty minutes, your frameworks, your findings. Not a canned demo.






