Skip to main content
Threatsys

Threatsys One suite

GRC 360Govern · Assess · Evidence · Certify

Unify risk, compliance, policies and audits into a single intelligent platform with automated assessments, audit workflows and evidence management.

Built in

  • Automated assessments
  • Audit workflow engine
  • Evidence management
  • Multi-framework mapping
Open the console
01

Govern

One control framework, mapped once across every standard, so a control satisfied for ISO is not re-evidenced for SOC 2.

02

Assess

Risk scored by a method that produces comparable results, with treatment decisions recorded against named owners.

03

Evidence

Artifacts collected continuously from your real systems rather than assembled in the fortnight before an audit.

04

Certify

The audit pack assembled from evidence that already exists, in the form the certification body expects.

What it is actually for

  • Are we compliant?

    Usually answerable only by asking four people and reconciling three spreadsheets that disagree.

  • Can we prove it?

    Controls that exist on paper and cannot be evidenced over a period are the single most common audit finding across every framework.

  • Why are we doing this four times?

    The same evidence collected separately for ISO, SOC 2, PCI and the customer questionnaire, because nothing maps to anything.

  • What is our real risk position?

    A risk register nobody has opened since the last audit, scored by a method two people would apply differently.

How it usually goes

  • Risk in one spreadsheet, controls in another, findings in email
  • Evidence gathered from scratch for every audit
  • Policies written, approved and never read again
  • Exceptions accepted once and never revisited

With GRC 360

  • One control set mapped to every framework you are held to
  • Evidence collected as work happens, then reused across audits
  • Control ownership assigned to named people with review dates
  • Exceptions that expire and come back for a decision

What is in the console

  • Risk management

    Register, scoring methodology, treatment plans and acceptance with expiry dates.

  • Audit management

    Internal audit scheduling, findings and closure tracking, with the trail auditors ask for.

  • Compliance mapping

    Cross-framework mapping so one control answers ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS and DPDP at once.

  • Vendor risk

    Tiered assessment, questionnaires and reassessment cycles rather than a one-off at onboarding.

  • Asset management

    The inventory every framework asks for, kept current rather than rebuilt annually.

  • Access governance

    Access reviews that run on a cycle and produce the evidence, instead of a spreadsheet emailed round.

How a rollout runs

  1. 01

    Scope

    Weeks 1 to 2

    Frameworks in play, boundary agreed and the control set mapped. Getting this right is the largest cost lever in the programme.

  2. 02

    Populate

    Weeks 3 to 8

    Controls, owners, risks and existing evidence loaded. Most organisations discover here how much evidence they already have and cannot find.

  3. 03

    Operate

    Months 3 to 6

    Evidence collection running automatically, internal audit completed, management review minuted.

  4. 04

    Certify

    Month 6 onward

    Stage 1 and Stage 2, or the SOC 2 observation window, with the pack assembled rather than written.

Choose how it is deployed

This is usually the first question a regulated buyer asks, and it changes the compliance position as much as the price. Pick one to see what it means for you.

A dedicated instance rather than a shared one, in the region you nominate, operated by us. This is what regulated entities usually land on: the operational burden stays with us, but your data sits alone and the boundary is easy to describe to an auditor.

Choose this when

  • Banking, capital markets and insurance
  • An auditor who asks where exactly the data sits
  • Contractual isolation requirements from your own customers

Effort and cost

Higher than shared cloud, and usually the answer when a regulator is involved.

What people ask before the first call

Is this just another GRC tool?

The difference we would claim is that an audit practice sits behind it. Most compliance platforms are built by software companies; this one is built by people who conduct the assessments and know which evidence a certification body actually accepts.

Do we need to define our controls before we start?

No, and trying to usually stalls the project. We start from the frameworks you have to satisfy and derive the control set from those, then map it once so evidence gathered for one audit serves the rest.

Which frameworks are supported?

ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 42001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, DPDP, GDPR, HIPAA, RBI, SEBI CSCRF and NIST CSF, with cross-mapping between them. If yours is not listed we will map it rather than tell you it is unsupported.

How much duplicate work does it actually remove?

Where an organisation holds three or four certifications we typically see fifty to seventy percent of evidence requests overlapping. If you carry only one obligation, the honest answer is that a full GRC programme may not be worth it yet.

Can our auditor access it directly?

Yes, through a scoped auditor role that sees the evidence and nothing else. It removes most of the email traffic that normally surrounds an audit.

Works with the rest of the suite

With AI SOC 360 on, incidents and their closure become audit evidence automatically. With DPDP 360 on, your privacy controls appear in the same control set rather than as a parallel programme.

See GRC 360 against your own environment.

Thirty minutes, your frameworks, your findings. Not a canned demo.

Book a walkthrough+91 96682 00222