Skip to main content
Threatsys

Cyber Security Audit & Review

Takedown Services

Rapid removal of phishing sites, impersonation accounts and fraudulent apps.

Takedown as-a-Service

Every engagement includes manual validation, a two audience report and free re-testing.

Get a scoped quote+91 96682 00222

What this actually is

A phishing site using your brand, a fake mobile app on a third-party store, a cloned social media account messaging your customers. Every hour one of those stays up costs you money and trust.

Takedown is mostly a process and relationships problem. Knowing which registrar, host or platform to approach, what evidence they need, and how to escalate when the first request is ignored.

We run that process for you, with escalation paths into registrars, hosting providers, app stores and platform abuse teams, and we keep pushing until the content is gone.

What we go after

  • Phishing site identification and takedown
  • Fake mobile application removal from stores
  • Social media impersonation accounts
  • Domain squatting and lookalike domains
  • Counterfeit and fraudulent listings
  • Leaked document and data removal where possible
  • Evidence preservation before removal

How we run it

  1. 01

    Understand the business

    What you do, what would genuinely hurt if it stopped, and how much risk your board will carry.

  2. 02

    Assess

    People, process and technology together, because attackers do not respect the boundary between them.

  3. 03

    Benchmark and rank

    Where you sit against your peers and your regulator, with findings ranked by real exposure.

  4. 04

    Roadmap

    A sequenced plan with costs attached, so the business case writes itself.

What you receive

  • Takedown request submission and tracking
  • Evidence pack preserved before removal
  • Status reporting through to closure
  • Recurrence monitoring after takedown

Who needs this

Banks, consumer brands, government departments and anyone whose customers can be defrauded by something wearing your name.

How long it takes

Hours to days for most platforms. Some registrars are slower and we escalate.

Standards this satisfies

  • IT Act
  • CERT-In
  • Platform abuse policies

Why it matters

There is a gap between knowing you have a security problem and knowing which one to solve first. Advisory work exists to close that gap: an independent view of where the risk actually sits, expressed in terms a board can act on and a budget can be built around.

The other reason is availability. Most organisations do not need a full time security leader, but they do need someone to ask before making a decision rather than after. The cost of the wrong architecture choice, or the wrong vendor, dwarfs the cost of the conversation that would have prevented it.

Choose how you want this delivered

Most of the price difference between quotes comes down to this one choice, and it is rarely explained. Pick one to see what it covers, what it suits and what it costs you.

A defined number of days a month with a named advisor who keeps context between conversations. This is what most organisations actually need: not a large project, but someone to ask before making a decision rather than after.

Choose this when

  • Decisions arriving faster than you can hire for
  • You need continuity rather than another report
  • Board or committee reporting on a regular cycle

Effort and cost

Monthly, with a defined day allocation. Far cheaper than a hire and available immediately.

Scope it yourself, before you call anyone

Answer a few questions and you get an indicative number, the working behind it and what your answers tell us. It runs in your browser, so nothing you type reaches us.

1/5

Which framework are you going for?

What we look for, and keep finding

These are the classes of problem this work exists to surface. Not every engagement finds all of them, but these are the ones that turn up often enough to be worth naming.

  • Capability that does not match the risk

    Heavy investment in one area and nothing in another, usually reflecting what a previous incident or a previous hire cared about rather than where the current exposure sits.

  • No owner for the important things

    Ask who owns third party risk, or identity, and the answer is a committee. Controls without a named owner degrade quietly and predictably.

  • Reporting that does not support a decision

    Dashboards full of counts that never answer the question a board actually asks, which is whether we are more or less exposed than last quarter and what it would cost to change that.

  • Unmanaged supplier concentration

    Several critical services resting on one provider, with no assessment of what happens if it becomes unavailable or compromised.

  • Plans that have never been tested

    Incident response and continuity documents that read well and have never been rehearsed. The first rehearsal always finds something, which is the point of having one.

Who runs your engagement

A practitioner, not a presentation

Advisory work is led by someone who has run security operations rather than only advised on them. The test we apply to our own recommendations is whether the person making them has had to live with a decision like it.

Questions we get asked

How fast can you get a phishing site down?

Cooperative hosts are often the same day. Bulletproof hosting in a jurisdiction that ignores requests can take much longer, and sometimes the practical answer is blocking rather than removal. We tell you which situation you are in early.

Should we preserve evidence first?

Always, and we do it as step one. Once a site is down the evidence is gone, and you may need it for a criminal complaint or an insurance claim.

Often scoped alongside

Ready to scope your takedown services?

Thirty minutes with a senior engineer, and you leave with a written scope and indicative effort.

Book a 30-min consultation+91 96682 00222